| Endorsed by GLRC Executive Committee on March 2, 2007  I. Introduction Invasive species come from outside an ecosystem, degrade habitat, 
		kill and/or displace native and naturalized species, and short-circuit 
		food webs needed to maintain and rehabilitate biological resources. The 
		Great Lakes region continues to face wave after wave of aquatic 
		invasion. Even after decades of high-profile invasions like the sea 
		lamprey and zebra mussel, the rate of new introductions has not slowed. 
		The Great Lakes, which are the world’s greatest freshwater lakes, are 
		succumbing to an irreversible biological damage that may be more severe 
		than chemical pollution, as aquatic invasive species (AIS) often make 
		the Great Lakes home, they reproduce and spread, rendering eradication 
		impossible. Existing measures to prevent the introduction of new species 
		and to control species that are already established are inadequate. The 
		Great Lakes cannot afford even one new invader, and as invasions are 
		irreversible, prevention is paramount.  Preventing the introduction of AIS is the first line of defense 
		against invasions. Several ongoing efforts, including the Great Lakes 
		Fishery Commission’s Sea Lamprey control program and the carp barrier on 
		the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, are working to prevent the 
		introduction and spread of AIS. The State of Michigan has passed ballast 
		water treatment legislation. States and cities have passed laws 
		prohibiting the importation and sale of a number of live AIS, shutting 
		down another vector for their introduction.  However, even the best prevention efforts may not stop all AIS 
		introductions. The Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (GLRC) Strategy 
		recognizes that early detection and rapid response efforts increase the 
		likelihood that invasions will be addressed successfully while 
		populations are still localized and can be contained and eradicated.  Federal, State, Tribal and Local governments, as well as 
		non-governmental entities, have developed a variety of approaches and 
		techniques to address AIS. Each of these governments has jurisdiction 
		over response agencies that will need to be activated when a new AIS is 
		detected. When a new potential invader is detected, being able to 
		efficiently coordinate and pool expertise and resources could mean the 
		difference between fully eradicating a species, merely controlling it, 
		or being overrun by yet another invasive species. The Strategy includes the following recommendation: 
			Establish an interagency Great Lakes Federal Rapid Response Team 
			that will conduct activities on federal lands, and in other 
			locations with State, Tribal, and Local cooperation. II. Proposed Activities By developing points of contact, establishing communication protocols 
		for coordination, and exploring a mock exercise, members of the GLRC 
		could begin to implement key aspects of this important recommendation.
		 Identify Agency Points of Contact and technical experts that could 
		be call upon to inform early identification and rapid response efforts. The Great Lakes ANS Panel - established in 1991 and comprising 
		representatives from government (State, Provincial, Federal, and 
		Tribal), business and industry, universities, citizen environmental 
		groups and others— met in December this December 13-14, 2006 in Ann 
		Arbor, Michigan to specifically discuss rapid response. They have made 
		the recommendation for Great Lakes agencies to establish an ad hoc 
		committee to populate the national ANSTF Expert Database.  The ANSTF database was designed to direct users to invasive species 
		experts. It has been set up as a 2-tier system with the first tier 
		accessible to the public. The public portion of the database will guide 
		you to an overall agency contact who acts as a filter for information 
		and identifications. If the tier1 person cannot answer the question, 
		these contacts have the ability to log in, identify, and refer the 
		question to the second tier experts. At this point the database is set 
		up for “overall points of contact” and “taxonomic experts”, which 
		presents a good initial step for this effort. More functionality to the 
		database can be added after we have demonstrated success in this initial 
		step.  Concurrently, though the Near Term Federal Action Plan, Federal 
		Agencies committed to “explore creating a Rapid Response Subcommittee 
		under the [Federal] Regional Working Group to serve as a central point 
		of contact for information and activities related to invasive species 
		rapid response efforts.” A Federal AIS Rapid Response Subcommittee (FAISRR 
		Subcommittee) has been formed to this end. Over the last few months, 
		FAISRR has developed a list of overall points of contact for the Federal 
		Agencies and made inroads to developing a list of technical experts. 
		This effort could be expanded by adding State, Federal, and Local 
		members and having these jurisdictions provide “overall points of 
		contact” and “taxonomic experts”.  The Great Lakes Panel’s recommendations are advisory only. Agency 
		managers need to commit their staff to identifying and inputting data in 
		order for this database to become functional. The GLRC is in a position 
		to act upon the Panel’s recommendations and demonstrate the Great Lakes 
		region’s leadership in populating this national database. It is 
		recommended that the GLRC accomplish this activity through the Great 
		lakes ANS Panel’s soon-to-be-formed ad hoc committee.  Proposed Schedule  
			Commitment to provide Agency Contacts and Taxonomic Experts 
			(March 2007 timeframe)Population of Database (Mar-April 2006 timeframe)Report out of success at GLRC Spring 2006 meeting.  Develop a Great Lakes Communication Protocol for rapidly 
		identifying new invaders and formulating response efforts. As was demonstrated by the recent discovery of “northern snakehead” 
		fish in Chicago, a rapid response effort will likely involve Federal, 
		State, Local and other resources. The development of a formal 
		Communication Protocol would help articulate how agencies will 
		communicate each other for an effective ad hoc rapid response effort. 
		This communication protocol will promote clear channels of communication 
		and rapid mobilization of resources in the event that new aquatic 
		invasive species are discovered in the Great Lakes. This protocol would 
		incorporate the points of contact identified in the previous steps and 
		outline the flow of communication between agencies. It may include the 
		following items (from the Great Lakes ANS Panels’ Model Rapid Response 
		Plan guidance):  
			Early Notification of Jurisdictional Authority or Designee Species Confirmation by Taxonomic Experts Notification of Participating Agencies via “Invasive Species 
			Response Coordinators” Identification of “Central Communication Officer” Identification of “Public Communication Officer” Formation of Ad Hoc “Scientific Assessment Committee” to inform 
			decision making. Deliberation and Decision on Management Approach by Authority or 
			Designee  Because there are different jurisdictions where invaders could be 
		discovered, different species (fish, plant, insect/pest) that would 
		involve different agencies with management authority, and different 
		availability of control measures - the development of a comprehensive 
		response protocol is likely beyond the resources of GLRC agencies at 
		this time. For example, MDEQ’s response plan for the invasive aquatic 
		plant Hydrilla is a single-species, single state plan that took years to 
		develop. The proposed Communication Protocol would apply to the early 
		stages of all rapid response efforts and promote the quick development 
		of a rapid response plan.  Proposed Schedule:  
			To be developed over Spring and Summer of 2007.  Explore conducting a Mock Exercise to test the Communication 
		Protocols. There is no better way to test the responsiveness and effectiveness 
		of the GLRC Communication Protocol than by conducting a mock AIS rapid 
		response exercise. This mock exercise can include a press event/outreach 
		piece to raise awareness. It will be important to have a protocol in 
		place before attempting this exercise.  Proposed Schedule  
			A small workgroup could explore the development of a Mock 
			Exercise over the Summer of 2007. |